طاهره رضایت

By opening a new window to look at the new ways of forming human societies, this research tries to answer the question, "How has the transformation of student activities in universities been from the ۱۳۵۷ revolution to today?" The theoretical framework of this article is drawn with the help of the theories of Michel Mafzoli, Alan Thorne, Jürgen Habermas and Yoze Van Dyck, and by articulating and articulating these ideas, it tries to expand the theoretical horizon. The methodology of this study is also a combination of thematic analysis methods with students and cultural officials of the ۶۰s, ۷۰s, ۸۰s and ۹۰s of Allameh Tabatabai University's School of Communication. The study of related and existing documents of these decades have helped this article to complete the research findings. In this section, an in-depth interview was conducted with ۶۷ students of different decades and seven cultural officials of these decades. The concepts obtained from the conversations along with the themes extracted from the documents helped to fill the gaps in the findings.

The results obtained from this research show that, firstly, the students' taste in activities has changed from political activities in the ۶۰s and ۷۰s to cultural and artistic activities in the ۸۰s and ۹۰s, and secondly, the nature of student groups from organizations, associations and centers with an unchangeable structure. While the giant of the university has cast a shadow over them, they have given their place to more flexible groups in the university. These transformations have various reasons, one of which is the limitation and deprivation of political freedom. The students, due to the requirements of their student status, did not reflect this space and moved to a new space. The second reason is the changes that have occurred in the social and cultural conditions of the society, and it has little to do with the prevailing political environment. The emergence and pervasiveness of social networks creates the feeling in people that they can enter the circles of their choice and benefit from its benefits without being present in official structures. In other words, membership in such difficult structures is not justified for people. What is happening in the university is a small example of what is happening in the society, and therefore it seems that human relations in the current society will also move around these situations.